I never thought I would write about something as lame as Hayden Kho. He, of meteoric rise to fame, courtesy of erstwhile or still love partner Dr. Vicky Belo.
But with the upsurge of interests over his amateurish sex videos, one would want to look a bit deeply on the issue.
My colleagues watched ‘em, a friend dropped by my place to share the files, to her delight. I saw them too.
It’s no way better than 70’s porn but since Hayden became a man of interest to some movie fanatics, his bed ways also became an issue of national or international curiosity and scrutiny.
I despise how he treated women. No matter their own personal issues, my interest is their own welfare as women so projected by him as mere sex objects. Who knows all of Hayden’s fratmates have already seen them all. Dr Vicky’s included. Grrr.
Some men really don’t care whether or not they have a thing to show to the public for public delight, that is, all they want to do is document something, that is for them, another primal and carnal conquest.
I just hope the law will be used to the fullest extent to penalize Hayden Ko and that the likes of him will ultimately be punished. That the PRC will be true to their rules and guidelines and will ultimately revoke Kho’s license to practice the medical profession. On what ground, you might ask. Well, any professional for that matter who commits moral turpitude is a basis enough for revocation. Moral turpitude in this instance is taking a video footage of his sexual act with women who allegedly did not know that a camera has been in place to take the shots. Any man of this nature, that is to document his sexual activities and dalliances with women is bound to be psychologically unsound, not necessarily of psychotic nature, that would free him legal liabilities by virtue of legal competence while doing the act but the very act of perpetuating the video footage from one woman to the next may actually be a sign for a clinical disorder. I am just not sure if voyeurism vis-a-vis exhibitionism can also be considered.
Given his looks and his medical practice, it would not be difficult to lure women to his bed. The thing is, if he is allowed to go scot-free particularly without the necessary treatment, this sort of misdeed may happen again to other women, albeit a different methodology.
While this may be a presumption, certainly, it is good to look into the swarming cases of scandalous videos being passed where a number women are victimized and violated.
And certainly, these perpetrators must never be allowed to practice professionally, especially if their field is anything that has to do with caring for the health and welfare of the people.
Anyway, so much for the serious stuff. These are my thoughts and that of others’ I have heard of late, regarding the videos are:
1.Katrina dances very well.
2. Hayden is bad in singing
3. Hayden’s dick is not as proportionate to his tall frame. meaning, not long and big enough.
4. Maricar is very pretty and did not look less virginal, before the video was out.
5. Worthy to note however, is Maricar’s prowess in bed.
6. The video with that Brazilian woman is poorly shot.
7. The video with Katrina is dimly shot.
8. That video with Maricar is extremely lighted. Only goes to show that they must have been doing it a number of times that it became a habit. No lighting drama is required.
9. Hayden can be a giver in bed, a nice boy to be exact. He seem to know where to hit the spot, except he doesn’t know how to handle the boobs.
10. But there is something about him that makes me entertain another thought, that of sexual confusion. (why else would you need a proof of your sexual conquest?)
11. Is Hayden closet gay? Could this be a reason of his alleged personality disorder apart from his hunger for attention?
I am a lesbian, so it’s not even an issue about homophobia, it’s just that to me, identity issue is apparent.
Just a thought.